Friends,
Last week, I wrote that Elazar ascends the mountain with Moses. That is not correct.
In Numbers 27:13-14, God commands Moses
ascend Mount Avarim...and you, too, shall be gathered unto your people, as was Aaron your brother... [for you both did not] sanctify me through Water... [at] the Waters of Strife
The plain reading is that Moses and Aaron both die on account of the Waters of Strife. I must have misremembered the text to say that Moses and Aaron are to die in the same way (Moses dies as did Aaron, his brother)—including being escorted by the same person (Elazar).
In a time-crunched week, I simply wasn’t careful with the text—and I apologize for that.
I’ve taken the week off from the Parsha so I’ll have ample time to prepare a well thought- out idea for Parshat Devarim.
A few additional thoughts on Joshua, Elazar, and the succession:
· As high priest, Elazar becomes the first national leader of his generation (all other leaders of his generation are tribal). This might make him a good choice to take on Moses’ position.
· Back in Num 24:7-14, Pinchas, Elazar’s son, saves the people from a plague. In return, God makes a pact with Pinchas and Pinchas’ descendants—who are, by extension, Elazar’s descendants as well. Thus, in addition to Elazar’s national role, his descendants are given a special place. Some degree of succession is built into Elazar’s family.
· When God says be gathered unto your people... as did Aaron your brother, one might ask if, in addition to God saying the brothers both die on account of the same offense, there might be a hint to the death itself being similar in some way (and see Rashi on verse 13).
· At Joshua’s inauguration, Joshua is to stand before Elazar the Priest and to inquire of him concerning the Judgment of the Urim v’Tumim (27:19-21). (The Urim v’Tumim are a part of Elazar’s priestly garments used to communicate with God—see Exodus 28:30.) Perhaps this scenario suggests Joshua assuming control over the priestly role. Alternatively, this may indicate that Joshua needs Elazar to enable him to lead, denoting Joshua as a complementary or even secondary leader to Elazar.
I’ll leave it to you to consider these points. Regardless, the text does not say that Elazar ascended the mountain with Moses as he did, earlier, with Aaron (Numbers 20:23-29).
My apologies again.
Abe
___
Some of my translation here based on JPS